8/02/2006 Larsen inspired by the recent meeting with Ultimaya (Paul Victor Duquaire, Philosopher)

Polling on the method of manufacture of these images.

How is the feedback declines in the pictures of Ultimaya?

Extending this concept usual for the project to a more philosophical concept to a more general

What is the nature of these images, what is it? On moving images that do nothing, ie not take the place of any visual reality. Image therefore not usual because no representative there, the liner was no perceptible world by the eye. There is no heaven, no house, no character, no landscape, anything that can resemble reality as we perceive it. What is the content of these images? No mutation that is not visual or symbolic. These images are formed from what? The unique nature of these visual images that holds no meaning and yet are many images that are animated. There is a movement. These images are the property of being constantly in motion. Flow on the move again. No mounting down, it is a process of image scrolling that do not seem to be strangers to each other natural continuity in the conduct of the elements that form and shape and transform . This continuity of natural elements, which takes place deforms, turns east near a stream become, we are in a future vision. What is shown is not the result of a linkage with the world or with others. It is no maintenance, documentary. What is shown results from a particular coupling. There yardstick indeterminacy constituent of these images. These images are in color or black and white. So there are color changes, which themselves become part of these visual images that are distorted, form, evolve.
These images do not mean hence the interest in the philosopher who will have to face a material infra-symbolic language phenomenological Husserl, a material inet composed of pure raw material form by not placing any intent by any object intentional interference by any object and thus a material infra-intentional much closer to that impulse and object contours defined. We are in the phenomena of resonance drives or shapes appear occur and then disappear and appear again and disappear. We are in a cycle or emerging forms identifiable, no meaning in our codes that are the language or that our visual perceptions. Forms of rosettes, others checkered, mushrooms, the forms arise and are related to anything already known and yet we can graft the symbolic but this can be done only retrospectively and video for Ultimaya is not to symbolize, to serve, but to return to this spring to form various differential. It is in this sense that I take the risk to give a definition to characterize these images as infrared images that are intentional to understand as being where the concept would have been if it had taken psychotropic drugs, for example, or alcohol of all kinds of stimulants that décorellent perception of the world perceived and allow thereby to show the transcendental subjectivity. Subjectivity is reserved in transcendental phenomenology Husserl to the technique the époquée of the suspension of the world. All psychotropic décorel as the reality of the world perceived operates a form of époquée. We can understand this viewpoint, with this tool as phenomenology, as the presentation of sub-state drives highly intentional devoid of meaning and therefore extremely close to some vulgar material not worked, not being in shape. The coarseness of the material refers to some form of intervention purity intentional, not a purity of imperfection on the contrary, but a purity intervention intentional event drives things that are phenomena which have a material ilets Gross, a very small share of intent.

To emphasize the singular aspect of these images. Often the video translated or betrays reality. An external reality and one could say that this is the presentation of the inner reality. It is no longer a spectator view of the world before us but what below any light in life and consciousness of the transcendental subjectivity polarized, to depolarize, resonance phenomenon drives, which are not applicable conscience, not applicable sub-intentional, unintentional devoid of intent therefore not seeking in any way to produce a shortage. A pure consciousness with the boredom that can produce well. A pure stream of animated images of themselves and not by another's will.
This object is thought to be an aesthetic object? Are there any aesthetic interest? We let the viewer, the true spectator, who is faced with these images as we smoke, full freedom of knowing. We do not want to say through this allocation philosophy, that these images are images with a well-known aesthetic placing them above the rank of immense work of contemporary art we do not want, we can not say such a thing . We can simply describe what is, what we see, what appears, which is ultimately realistic that any appreciate.

How are these images produced? There is no history, no drama, no narration, no meaning to these images. There is a process pure and simple form that appears to be forming distorting transforming itself disappear and then reappeared under other auspices. With no narration, we can understand that these images are the result of any assembly and they are not post-produced, ie produced after being seized, but they are seized and produced at the same time, produced in the seizure itself. What makes our video? Although we have visited so far and quite brief the device used by Ultimaya that is to claim the same device that characterized the name and video feedback, we were able to get a clear picture in them speak on this device itself. This is not us, this is not me who is the first person experience of this device, but it is through their experience repeated in the third person, that I understood their device production . What is it? The video feedback is to have a screen. A white screen, this screen is filmed with a camera. The signal is recorded by the camera and then projected on the screen (the same screen itself), and this signal, amplified and ReproJet and of course again seized by the same camera so that there is a closure between the image captured by the camera and the image produced by the rétroprojeter and video projector. A time lag between the two generates a process, and therefore it is in the lair of technology it must seek the principle of temporal sequence of images and because of the input signal amplification, and this Product resonance phenomena; acoustic resonance within the meaning of the term ie the physical sense, signal amplitude, which has a disproportionate and exaggerated the magnitude of this signal because rétroprojete particular forms and can be distorted, reformed Processed by the camera angle or position of the camera from the screen. There is therefore a phenomenon of open-loop because it yal'écran. Open-loop distortion. It is in a spiral process. The signal before never the same as the projected signal. That is the principle of audio feedback. When you approach the microphone that records the signal from the speaker that broadcasts the recorded signal, there is a phenomenon of acoustic resonance that produces a hiss. It is the same video, there is not a whistle but spots, stains of color, see identifiable forms identified in fact quite logical. Between the camera and video projector, Ultimaya sometimes use a video mixer, there is a manipulation of the signal through an intermediary mixer. We see how the image is coupled with itself. We see how the image is coupled, which set produced from itself. It is self coupled. It looks now happening, being formed, in the process of turning, moving, and it is seeking. Ultimaya said through these visual experiments that it is seeking the absolute image, the image of God. An absolute form, an appearance that could take place only in this form of contemplation of itself as self-coupling of video feedback. Nevertheless it is clear there is no divine attribute in these images and not one absolute recurring universal immutable. The search for the intentionality of the highest form is accompanied by a total disavowal of the highest form because of his absence by his inaparition reported. What is most fascinating is that is looking at itself, autovidéaste might say, discovers a world of form and especially flow in perpetual motion. This flow may be based on the spirit, or boring or enjoyment for some personality. There is therefore a pleasure that may emerge in contemplation of such self-generated images. The world is totally alien to these images. One can understand why from this production, there is no meaning. It is in a kind of coupling is real and auto. There is therefore a principle of recurrence which is obtained spiral phenomena that are close to some suites mathematics, to some extent arithmetical. Self coupling is a kind of self-perception in self-perception of itself. It al'apparition not the same, but the difference. In seeking to project the same thing as perceived, of what is before what is captured by the camera, and this is not a still image, and the same, always the same, which is there, but is the difference that is generated. It touches a philosophical problem which is the same and the other in this case the same intentionality, the absolute form, the absolute image of white display absolute reveals a wealth of difference , Of otherness, of alteration.
And this combination of sameness and otherness, it could be a rapprochement with Jacques Derrida, who wanted to describe his concept of difference with a. Difference being exposed in the 1967 book From grammatologie.
So, auto pairing, and polymorphism could bring this same concept of self-référentialité and polymorphism at work Husserl itself, if it is considered an outsider's point of view, a point is auto since It seeks to characterize the consciousness, phenomenology is a phenomenology of consciousness, namely what is what is distorted what changes in consciousness and technology used is that of writing. The writing should reflect what is obvious to the conscience by being close to what is obvious. And we are not in categories from Husserl there is much in the show itself is not in the manner we are rather in the gross materiality of the phenomena and they are treated with a language referring to concepts to categories Husserl denies ever using concepts with a definitive definition. He preferred the broader meaning of concepts to a certain dissolution. And while targeting the conscience itself, Husserl finally made a kind of feedback where phenomenological phenomenology can be seen as the stream of consciousness and trying to be seen but always escaping in the apprehension and itself to this feed At this impressive number of pages written by the author himself who are just hours and hours of contemplation of the consciousness of self contemplation and he said for example in the Cartesian Meditations phenomenology to spot this self knowledge Naturally. Self self-knowledge is self perception, self explanation. And therefore, a phenomenon of feedback are clearly in the phenomenology of Husserl, and this phenomenon is Larsen said, is that of the conscience of the philosopher, who wrote Husserl, which vidéoprojete on the blank page of writing with Gabelsberger its method of shorthand, because using this method he wrote much faster to describe his conscience which describes and at the same time it receives written and thus transforms. It was precisely in this particular phenomenological writing, a pattern of closures that qualify for any feedback, I make the parallel between the audio feedback rock band and especially the video larsen larsen philosophical and therefore is the scriptural phenomenology which appears as a literary phenomenon of highly Larsen. Those who adhere to the same movement of production of signs and much less to be served and the meaning. The signified and the signifier is the problem of interpretation and we are not there, this is not the point of view of a historian of philosophy or a philosopher in the classical sense that tend to say that Husserl wanted to say this or that we are in the original production of signs. Phenomenology is a company that relies on a device that is the feedback as videos of Ultimaya and that this feedback may be essential to the phenomenon of building signs than served, beyond meaning.
45 '
The least would larsen a curiosity that something fundamental. That may be the assumption that you can remember. What are the implications in the philosophical sense of feedback?
Any business establishment signs in its core nature of feedback that is to say that everything possible would be created as a result of a process of self perception and self producing a process that apparently is closed on itself but which in reality is not autistic which is closed while being opened. This closure opening is not obvious to understand,

This game opening and closing is not easy to characterize. Derrida was themed with a difference as a form of a sameness and difference at a time. Any process of creation within it would be the result of a closure open a self cooupalge a coupalge srtucturel with itself.

Which Dreamed it?