Consciousness and existence



The being is an idea, the idea is one. It must be something in what this is, even if it is purely an appearance, there must be what perceives and thinks. The objects and their relationships are given in a contingency and complexity infinite. All judgments, science or value to them are arbitrary, to use a word, thought to neglect its entire process and its nature to isolate themselves in a particular avenue of pursuit.

The desire to know is a superlative field and dominant when no longer reported as unbreakable mental process of a comprehensive life itself rigid in our world, which discourages any attempt to inscriptions and understand that the mere push and nudity q'uon has long called desire for truth.

If the perception was the whole truth, no deviation, no issue would take place. If the sovereign property was a real sense, humanity might have found its rest in mathematics. If God was a response to the height of the interrogation opened by this idea, the science world and would like too.

But thinking like life is work, are in motion, and no argument can not receive the seal of the final, as well as an insect pinned is no longer a live animal. Also it is successful, a flowering tree does not next spring, and religions, artists, philosophies and all acts of men succeed without more progress than the seasons. The illusion is that of practice "advanced decisive", not to mention myths of past losses regrettable.

We see the same earth and the heavens that the same old mountains majesty with the same dry, rivers have the same impermanence, the human soul still seems unfathomable, and each blade has the same freshness of a present that s done without but without one or domination. We can not live something else that this basic philosophy, "the contingency of all that is" knowing that no such designation will not matter.

If real life was elsewhere, everybody would be gone settle, and everybody would probably have seen elsewhere is another here - but if she were here, there would be little question that the phrase did not even necessary. Unless there is coincidence too narrow to be cast in the interlacing of words, and that what is sought is too close not to be removed from the turmoil of a gesture of quest. In particular, when the object of the investigation becomes only the subject of heavy paradoxes emerge, paralysis and was thinking clearly oscillates between a vacuum and blindness.

That means a language? The origin of the body is included and is omnipresent secret, either sex or genome. The original word is a word, and nothing that is located - it is only through effective combination of words that seem to arise from other words. Bodies create other bodies, and ideas seem to give rise to other, and it is easily confused and a temporal succession ontogenic.

The blur is borne primarily by the around me: is it the source of his actions? While it is clear that it is not because of his perceptions, how would it thoughts? and if not because it must be receptive - false alternative, the observer is the ultimate creator.

"O conscience does not disturb the mind by certainties and uncertainties!"
Ashtavakra Gita XV, 16