Origin of truth



IDENTIFICATION - I

The research gives a prize to the object and first life.
Thus the attitude ontological Indians and Greeks be fit to be.
But he was already in the language. But there was function, not idea;
"To be" is another location and position later to mind.

If research is the philosophy of being, his investigation is on this word on itself.
"The being is" says nothing, but an identity that we should understand.
The meaning is not to find it accompanies our interrogation
and enriched by any deepening, theses and contradictions.

Here again be a focal length is a unit ideal that our quests fourbissent,
expand and lots of lights, relationships that this s'incorporent X.
The views, thoughts become magically as attributes
of what we are, reinforcing the illusion of its identity.

"The concrete is the abstract rendering familiar through use." Things
are familiar with the use that is a spontaneous creation, but this word
Paul Langevin is also relevant to the concepts, because its validity, its truth
is his way of being practical, as the ends of the world are useful things.

This baptism affects human ideas and things, these preferred units
of cultural and natural worlds in a indistinction which makes it transparent.
But the observation scholarly cover a world of a new abstraction,
and consideration of a concept raised both its reasons that his arbitrary.

What is awarded the title of true or useful
is entered in a certain intention, we may appoint
a trait - validity. And behind this attribute, certainly
the value is power, some statement or consistency.

I prefer such darkly design, which I provided weaves clothes
spiritual, because they are brand affiliation, strength or intelligence.
Thus the effective symbolic ideas should not be underestimated.
They are heroes, treasures, monsters that inhabit the worlds of the mind.

The ravages of logic themselves, the names of great thinkers,
life experience or laboratories, the desire for objectivity,
while acting in the manner of charms, despite that we had.
The concepts are our most powerful gods, their other disparate people.

And ourselves in these phantasmagorias abstract of the "inner world"?
Should we not cover everything that we are playing near us?
Yet we almost always appear as one of our characters,
a polyp which would be the huge sum of its unstable psychological dramas.

Our face is the work of an elusive Arcimbaldo, and our body
a mosaic of grave nature. We separate concepts, qualities,
as features on the faces that we reproduce in us,
these traits are changing almost deform, but still identifiable.