Origin of truth



IDENTIFICATION - II

If we are the midst of our representations, or the perception
that makes them seem, how can we be together
one of the characters in our internal theater, or even actor?
This will identify, by oblivion and investment consciousness.

But to recognize, "find themselves" in particular players such actress,
means we have some self-image compared confused.
If the child is projected in the young hero of the film or story,
how aware she was first installed in the child?

If I was a virgin, if I was nothing, how would I did the first act?
But this is not a choice, it is a situation, and I immediately
before you can say, or even see, the more choice.
Because the choice is an abstract notion of surface to exist.

I was, and I identify with my hero, I gave my body fears
and my dreams well before formulating a clue myself.
The prince and cosmonaut were figures of my life
like the red-haired kid my parents named Noah.

The distinction adult and easy real and the imaginary
is slow, late and never complete if I am now a teacher,
or married, or philosopher, it is much more personnifications,
infinitely more valid than others, according to the criteria of time, place.

But I know in the back that I play a character,
a collection of figures and that my soul is more a troupe
actors a legal reality. Life prohibits me
Prince to be or not Jedi professor of philosophy.

But the imagination is not confined to one, the real one,
each situation for-itself, each status is an artifact,
a comprehensive and imagination in the world to be real
Only by my unwavering focus - acceptable or delusional.

The child's arms extended run that engine noise
it does not need to reprimand him, remind him
it is not a plane, but a child. When Nietzsche
sign letters Dionysus, who deny that reason goes astray?

But imagine you're Mr. Nietzsche or Mr. Peyre
is not another delusion, which has an alibi for him
social coherence, a fragile validity convention?
The aircraft, the Greek god, Dear are machinery, symbols.

Delirium is rather in the adhesion to one of these figures,
and the blindness consecutive in the alleged choice.
Because neither the children's games, or the faces that dominate cultures
nor their statutes are ordinary subjects of conscious election.